Politicians+and+pets_discussions

Polina_E

We can not say that politicians shouldn’t have pets in their environment. This is the choise of the politicians themselves to have some pets or not. As for the pets I think that it is good to be in politician’s environment. Because, they would get some privilege from their owners. Actually Russian does not like politicians themselves. But I think when people see their pets on television, they just admire and people’s opinion is changing about politicians. Appearing pets in a public affected in the politician’s career. And if one politician has the same pet as have ordinary people. They would say that they have similar pet. I mean that it can help to politicians, because they have unifying factor with people through their pets. It shows that politicians are humane when they have a pet, because pets vulnerable : they can’t feed themselves; pets need care from human being. So these human qualities are associated with having pets. Therefore I am for the pets in the politicians' environment!

Zayana

Many famous people have pets. And it's their thing to buy pets or no. They do not have to ask someone permission to buy anything. I don't care who has what pets,and even if they have them ! Everyone has the right to decide when and how to wind a pet

Delya Politicians are the people like we. They also want to care of somebody and to be cared. He may be lonely man who hasn’t got family, and he wants to share his troubles and success. But on the other hand politician whose work demands responsibility and they must think about such global troubles as economics, country development, relationships between other countries, etc. But animals cannot understand such kind of problems. Having a pet ,I think, proves their reliableness and increase their publicity, fame.